The State Strategic Telecommunications Plan Task Group will begin formulation of a Statewide Telecom plan for Arizona. The Strategic Plan will include a strong mission statement, an overview of specific impacts of telecommunications in the State, an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the Telecom industry, an outline of current broadband deficit areas in the State, and a prioritization of problem solving that policy and decision makers can use. Numerous other States' plans will be looked at for concepts and ideas.
The Arizona Broadband Authority Task Group will begin surveying the necessities to create a funding Authority for Broadband (similar to Michigan's and other States). Primary consideration by that Authority will be the disposition and management of monies derived from the creation of an Arizona Broadband Universal Service Fund (ABUSF). Defining the charter for the Authority, and the various legislation necessary to bring such Authority and ABUSF into existence will be the goal of the Task group.
The Telecommunications Right-of-Way Task Group will continue the work done by a number of State Agencies in 2001-2002.. The Task Group hopes to fashion policies and processes regarding telecommunications infrastructure which will lead to:
- A definition of Telecommunications Infrastructure as "Critical" Infrastructure
- More efficient utilization of citizen owned right-of-way Infrastructure, whereby citizens pay for such infrastructure just once.
- A ubiquitous and affordable availability of Broadband by all citizens of the State, because of the combination of new Right-of-Way policies and funding mechanisms.
Galen then reported on the ongoing activity concerning Superior, Arizona, and introduced Rosalyn Boxer of the Arizona Department of Commerce, Ralph Velez, Superior Town Manager, and Hank Gutierrez, Project Manager. Superior is looking to introduce broadband telecommunications into the community. They are working with Arizona Public Service (APS) and some other local stakeholders, especially Resolution Copper. A $270,000 grant has been approved and is to be signed later today. It includes matching dollars and in-kind contributions, a portion of which ATIC is providing. The RFQ has not yet been written. It will include the details.
Grant Activity on WiFi Security Project - Status Report (Oris Friesen)
Oris reported that one more revision is needed for the Final Report to the Homeland Security Information Technology and Evaluation Program (ITEP). This will be completed before the end of June. Information about the project can be found at the following website: http://atic.researchedge.com/wireless/
The University of Advancing Technology (UAT) will be conducting a security analysis of the WiFi Corridor.
Pat Lanthier, a member of the California ITEP project met with Galen and Mark. He would like to involve ATIC in a wireless consortium that he is establishing in California. He will submit a proposal to ATIC in the near future.
Allan Meiusi of WI-VOD indicated that the state of Kansas would also be interested in working with ATIC.
Ron Schott suggested that WI-VOD should be invited to make a presentation to ATIC.
Cyber Security Committee Report (Jerry Crow, Jeni Li)
Jerry Crow indicated that he is ready to manage the November 16th ATIC Public Information meeting, with a focus on security issues.
Jerry also encouraged people to attend the monthly InfraGard meetings held on the 3rd Monday of each month. More information can be found at http://www.phoenixinfragard.net/.
FCC Meeting on Broadband in Rural Arizona (Al Sterman)
Mark reported on a meeting he had in Washington, D.C. with Robert Somers of the FCC. Somers is very interested in cross-state cooperation, so this makes any involvement with a California consortium interesting to him. He is also interested in making contact with Governor Napolitano and Chris Cummiskey, especially because Napolitano is heading up the Western Governors' Association for the next year.
Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) Activities (Tom Campbell)
No report this time.
Arizona Telecommunications Directory (Galen Updike, Brad Tritle, Ralph Gierish)
ACTION ITEM: Steve Peters agreed to follow up on this matter and report back to the Board at the September 2006 meeting.
GAZEL Report (Steve Peters)
No report this time.
eSATS Report (Ted Kraver)
Ted reported that the eSATS bill SB1512 is still in play. Hopefully it will succeed.
ED. NOTE: The bill was subsequently signed into law by the Governor. CONGRATULATIONS to Ted and everyone else who assisted in making this happen!
up to agenda
Monthly "General Information" Meetings (Mark Goldstein)
Mark reported that the June 22 meeting will be organized by Galen Updike and will focus on Right-of-Way (ROW) issues.
Galen noted that this meeting would be held jointly with the Telecommunications Right-of-Way Task Group of the Communication Infrastructure Advisory Committee (CIAC).
up to agenda
Announcements
Ron Schott reported that the Arizona Technology Council (AZTC) is planning to publish an informational brochure on all 90 legislative seats and the respective candidates for the 2006 election.
up to agenda
Informational Presentations
up to agenda
Next ATIC Board Meeting
The next ATIC Board Meeting will be July 12, 2006 12:00-2:00 p.m. at Lewis & Roca in downtown Phoenix.
up to agenda
Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 2:00 p.m.
up to agenda
attachment 1
Arizona Telecommunications & Information Council (ATIC)
ATIC Mission Committee Meeting Notes 12/14/05 (Final)
White Board Notes by Mark Goldstein, International Research Center
- ATIC Organizational Bandwidth
- Concerns with availability of volunteer resources and loss of focus with too many active projects
- ATIC Infrastructure Projects
- ATIC DHS WiFi Security Project for First Responders viewed as successful project & model
- Overview and deliverables on ATIC site at http://atic.researchedge.com/wireless/
- Market and promote ATIC & infrastructure opportunities based on its success - A jewel!
- Strong interest in Owning, Managing and/or Enabling Additional Infrastructure Projects
- ATIC should be a change agent and catalyst, not an operating agency
- Prove technology and methods, advance policy agenda, and move on
- Should limit primary activities to pilot stage and let full implementation follow elsewhere
- Consultative role possible with multiple communities and stakeholders
- Partner with a community, not every community - Can't boil the ocean!
- Are communities set up for success? Local organizations and champions?
- Always drive recognition and planning for continuity and sustainability
- Insure useful metrics and good accountability/governance
- ATIC is a 501(C)6 not 501(C)3 limiting some sponsorship and grant opportunities
- Consideration of project or organizational liability beyond D&O insurance episodic with projects
- ATIC Future Grant and Project Opportunities
- ATIC should put additional projects and funding opportunities in the grant pipeline
- Overhead and some modest organizational support should come from project $ in most cases
- Danger we could lose our objectivity and/or credibility by "profiting" from projects
- Role of the Broadband Development Authority (BDA) in creating pool of funds and projects
- Right of Way (ROW)
- Study and document ownership, related regulation and oversight, and issues of access and use
- Identify current ROW owners, access process & precedents, contact vectors to online database
- Educational outreach through public forums, process flow charts, possible white paper, web site
- Convene stakeholders (owners, various users, telecom providers, government oversight representatives)
- Need a forward looking view for strategic purposes, Facilitate dialogue and develop solutions
- GCIT CIAC may take the lead with ATIC playing a more consultative role
- Explore simplifying and standardizing ROW policies/procedures, banking & trading of ROW
- Could broadband have a "special status" with a legislative solution for consistency?
- Critical infrastructure protection requires redundant pathways for resiliency
- ATIC should develop and advocate solutions driving regional cooperation and policy evolution
- Consider localizing activity on an as needed basis and helping solve specific problems
- Will wireless solve many ROW issues by "jumping" over middle and last mile deployment barriers?
- Spectrum allocation issues, ATIC should monitor and educate
Universal Service
- Current ACC Arizona program limited in scope & only applies to basic POTS for rural & high cost areas
- Legislative advocacy and legislated solutions may be needed but are very difficult and uncertain
- Voucher program for rural broadband services might be a good delivery mechanism
Other ATIC Issues/Interests
- Possible partnering with Arizona Technology Council, AAED, DOC, Chambers, Developers' Groups
- Vendor Advisory Committee, Regional Roundtables, Other GCIT CIAC Collaboration
- Grant Proposal Support, Community Telecom Assessments (CTA), Statewide Strategic Plan.
up to agenda