|
|||||||||
![]() |
An economic development foundation of the Governor's Strategic Partnership for Economic Development (GSPED) |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| ATIC > Committees > Elections > Position > ACC Candidates > Question | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | |||||||||
Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) Candidates Question 7
What are the three most important issues facing the Corporation Commission over the next 2 to 4 years?
George Cunningham (Democrat, Clean Elections Candidate, 2 Year Seat, http://www.cunningham2002.com/)
(about George Cunningham...)
Mike (Lowell) Gleason (Republican, Clean Elections Candidate, 2 Year Seat)
(about Mike (Lowell) Gleason...)
Deregulation of electric power generation, integration of long distance service and local service, amelioration of rate shock that the new arsenic law will cause and continuation of the consumer fraud investigations conducted by the ACC.
Jeff Hatch-Miller (Republican, Clean Elections Candidate, 2 Year Seat, http://www.hatch-miller.org/)
(about Jeff Hatch-Miller...)
Three important issues stand out at present. I will focus on these issues until they are resolved:
Commissioners serve as the representatives of Arizona citizens in dealing with large and powerful corporations. I will work to ensure the Commission's policies and actions are fair and provide benefit to all Arizonans.
Jim Irvin (Republican, Clean Elections Candidate, 4 Year Seat, http://www.jimirvin.org/)
(about Jim Irvin...)
While there are many important issues that Commission faces over the next 2 to 4 years, I will limit my answers to issues related to telecommunications. The issues are not listed in any particular order of importance.
The first most important issue relates to competition itself. The Commission, through the process of reviewing Qwest's 271 application, has created an environment, which has never been better suited for competition to develop. The Commission will need to continue to monitor the progress of competition, mindful of the constantly evolving nature of this industry, to ensure that it continues on the right path. During this time, the Commission will be charged with making necessary adjustments, if needed, in a timely fashion, to best protect Arizonans.
A second important issue relates to the development and upgrading of infrastructure. Many communities are currently being served by antiquated systems which can hardly be utilized for POTS ("Plain Old Telephone Service") lines, yet alone advanced services such as high speed data. In order to remain attractive to industry, especially high tech industry, investments need to be continually made in Arizona's telecommunications infrastructure. The Commission will need to continue to require that all telecommunications companies intending on doing business in Arizona, must also invest in its infrastructure, state-wide.
Finally, the third important issue facing the Commission is the stability of the industry itself. Telecommunications giants, such as WorldCom and Global Crossings have filed Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection. Over the past two years small Competitive Local Exchange Carriers ("CLECS") have closed their doors at alarming rates. Where the nation's economy has generally suffered throughout this time, the telecommunications industry has been particularly hard hit, and has not yet shown signs of recovery. While protecting Arizonans from high rates and unreliable service is the primary duty of the Commission, it also needs to be mindful of the industry's need to remain viable and to facilitate growth. As such, the Commission must make sure that its actions do not have the unintended consequences of furthering the instability in the industry.
Roland James (Democrat, Clean Elections Candidate, 2 Year Seat, http://www.rolandjames.org/)
(about Roland James...)
Moving back to Teddy Roosevelt-like regulation of public goodsÑelectricity, water, and basic phone service... Making sure that the securities marketplace has suitable boundaries and is as fair, open, and as just as possible. In light of the drought and global climate change (see, for example, July 2,'02 The Economist cover story: "CO2AL: Environmental enemy No. 1"), helping move gradually away from coal and fossil fuels to the efficiency/solar/wind/biomass/fuel cell/hydrogen economy. Just as failure to move from charcoal to coal 200 years ago would eventually have meant denuded land and failing economies, the failure to make this technological transition could make for disaster: "That points to the biggest fear: warming may trigger irreversible changes that transform the earth into a largely uninhabitable environment." Quote from The Economist article above. For example, could much of the Rocky Mountain West become uninhabitable--like the Australian Outback? Even the Bush administration says that there likely will be the permanent disappearance of Rocky Mountain meadows.
James Walsh (Democrat, Clean Elections Candidate, 4 Year Seat, http://www.jamespwalsh.com/)
(about James Walsh...)
ACC Candidates > Question | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
For the ACC candidates' responses to the Arizona Republic's questions please see
http://arizonarepublic.com/special43/articles/corpissues.html